Opinions and perceptions are the way many people
colour the world we live in. How a person perceives events, people or attitudes
profoundly affects their lives. Being opinionated, however, only seems to raise
hackles in all those around them, but never in themselves. Most people live
comfortably in their opinions. When it comes to the dangers of offering up an uninvited
opinion, the only parallel I can draw is going for a leisurely stroll in a
minefield while blind-folded.
To borrow a phrase, opinions are like a nose (or
fill in your choice of body parts).... everyone has one. Quite often they have more than one and in
general, people are not shy about disseminating them to anyone who wants to
hear them. Sadly enough, they are also imparted to those who don't want to hear
them. Many a peaceful family get together have been disrupted with a drunken opinionated
rant of one kind or another.
Opinions do not have to be fact based; in fact they
rarely are. They can be uninformed, uneducated, unbelievable or unwavering, but
yet they are still put out on display and held up as a shiny example. On the
other hand, opinions can be well thought out, unimpinged by emotional or moral
convictions, well balanced and reasonable in logic for all. Of course, these opinions
are about as common as fairy dust.
Even the internet has its IMHO (In My Humble
Opinion) which finds its way onto newspaper comment boards and newsgroups. It
appears to me that by just prefacing their comments with this acronym it allows
the poster a carte blanche opportunity to opine about anything at all. If you have read any of these, there is rarely
anything humble about their opinions.
Historically, Kingston certainly has had a fair
amount of raging public opinion. When our present day City Hall was constructed
in the 1840's, the general opinion of the day was that it was a little too
grand and a lot too expensive to build for such a small town. It was felt that
the tax burden would be too much for future generations to handle. Does that
sound at all familiar?
It was a huge gamble thinking that by erecting such
a grandiose building that the government would decide to stay put and keep the
capital here. As we all know, it was decided that Kingston was far too small,
not cosmopolitan enough and didn't offer enough amenities for those political
folks and off the capital went. Still, in hindsight, imagining Kingston without
City Hall and its cupola would be like imagining Paris without the Eiffel
Tower. If opinion would have ruled the day and the naysayers won out, then that
limestone edifice might never have been constructed.
The list of conflicting opinions on past and present
local issues goes on and on.... the Teron Project, Block D, the Hendon Hole,
the location of the KRock Centre, the merging of high schools KCVI and QECVI, the
third crossing, right down to today's opposing opinions on high-rises in the centre core of Kingston. We never seem
to be running short of expressing conflicting opinions in this town.
Worldwide events, specifically the Brexit Referendum
is a perfect example of asking for public opinion, getting it and then asking
what the hell were they thinking. There
are historic reasons why the general public is often referred to as the "great
unwashed". Referendums are a
wonderful way for the elected politicians to be absolved of any controversial
subject and declare that, "the public has spoken". Forgive me, but I
thought that was the general underlying principle of elections. We elect people
to make informed, educated decisions that affect our future. If every time an
important decision is needed to be made and the people we elect to make
decisions for us throw it back at us (and at considerable expense) then what is
the whole purpose of electing these people in the first place?
Here in Canada, do we really need the public's input
by holding a referendum on changing the electoral process? I would bet the
majority of Canadians don't understand or care about the entire process of today's
system, let alone giving them two or three other options to chose from. Just getting them to vote in the first place
is a big enough challenge. In the case of the United Kingdom, we have to
remember this is the same group of people who voted to name the Arctic research
ship, "Boaty McBoatyface". You
leave the economic future of your country in these hands?
A glance south of the border only reinforces where
public opinion will get you. While the Democrats have followed along on a
predictable path where general opinion seems to have fallen in line with
expectations of the party, the Republicans have been asking the same question
as the Brits. What the hell were they thinking? The right has spoken and it
seems to be in a language that the G.O.P. hasn't translated yet.
Where does this all lead? Everyone is entitled to
their opinion just as everyone is free to express their opinion. As George H.W.
Bush once said, "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't
always agree with them". Well, if the past leader of the most powerful
nation in the world can't agree with his own opinions, then where does that
leave the rest of us?
Of course you must take note, this is only IMHO.